Sunday, August 9, 2009

Jhajjar: Terming the Kadian Barha khap panchayat’s dictum of “expulsion” for the entire Gehlout family from Dharana village as “hard”, the Sarva khap panchayat reduced the punishment to the family at its meeting held in Beri town here today to resolve the ongoing gotra controversy over a “forbidden” marriage of Ravinder Gehlout with a girl of Kadian gotra.

After deliberating on the issue for several hours, the Sarva khap panchayat allowed the Gehlout family except the groom and the bride - Ravinder and Shilpa - to live in the village with symbolic penalty of one “kaudi”. However, they banned the entry of Rohtash, father of Ravinder, in the village for the next three months.

Ravinder and Shilpa would remain in exile forever. With this revised judgement, a month-old stalemate over the row has resolved.

The verdict of the Sarva khap panchayat was pronounced by the president of the Dahiya khap, Subash Dahiya, who was also the convener of the committee formed during the panchayat to take a final decision in this regard.

When the judgement of giving relaxation to the Gehlout family was announced, two groups belonging to the Kadian gotra entered into a verbal duel leading to blows between them.

One of the groups also reportedly manhandled with Subash Dahiya, Sukhbir Singh, Jagdeep Ahlawat, and Virender Gehlout and caused injuries to them. The police rushed to the spot and controlled the situation by dispersing both the groups.

The accused group alleged that all persons, who were also the members of the judgement committee, deliberately softened the verdict taking favour of the Gehlout family.

Earlier, a significant number of people belonging to various khaps participated in the meeting and listened to the leaders of various khaps on the issue.

After a long discussion, a committee for taking the decisive decision regarding the row was constituted under convener Subhash Dahiya. The committee took nearly an hour to pronounce its decision.

Meanwhile, hailing the Sarva khap panchayat’s verdict, Naseeb Singh, one of the uncles of Ravinder Gehlout, said the panchayat had done justice by revising the dictum of the Kadian khap, hence they would honour the verdict.

The Gehlout family had been facing a “social boycott” since a month for alleged “violation” of social norms by marrying Ravinder with Shilpa Kadian.



Naresh Kadyan,
Convener, Kadyan Khap International,
-http://kadyankhapinternational.blogspot.com/
C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar,
Sector - 14, ROHINI,
DELHI - 110085.
-http://www.indymedia.org/en/2009/07/926933.shtml
+91-9813010595, 9313312099.
Please join -http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/kadyankhap

-http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200907/1248367416.html
-http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200908/1249827224.html
-http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200907/1249054381.html
-http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200907/1247905690.html
-http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/08/435964.html

Saturday, July 18, 2009

http://kadyankhapinternational.blogspot.com/
Please click above link to know the observation of the KADYAN KHAP INTERNATIONAL....

Shilpa Kadyan of Siwah weds with Ravinder Gahlot of Dharana in the month of march, 2009.....routine work, no problem but social network does not allow both of them to get marry because village Dharana comes under barah kadyan khap area, where KADYAN gotra in majority and KADYAN of village Siwah roots also in Dubaldhan adjoining Dharana.Shilpa is a daughter for KADYAN's can not be be a daughter in law....this point was raised by the Kadyan Khap, nothing wrong.
Kadyan Khap International investigate the whole matter and in the opinion that :
-Jat community people think before marry about
* Self gotra
* Mother and grand mothers gotra.
If the proposal for bride or groom does not match any gotra's as mentioned above then no harm to marry.
Ravinder being an a resident of Kadyan dominated village Dharana can not marry to Kadyan gotra girl as this is the compulsion of the society / social network, as reported he was adopted by his aunt (his father sister married in Sultanpur - Delhi) then no harm, if :
-Shilpa and Ravinder should claim for Sultanpur village - adopted parents dynasty not of Dharana family.
- Ravinder's new mother (Bhua)should get her share in her parental property in Dharana and Ravinder shall not be entitle to claim any legal heirs rights.
Some people in Kadyan Khap asked for divorce but Kadyan Khap International not in the same opinion - views, the intention of the KADYAN KHAP was also not wrong and parents of the couple
are responsible for any misunderstanding / controversy in the area, they be asked for clarification, responsible or misrepresenting the facts before society. Criminal proceeding against 20 representative of Kadyan Khap be dropped.


Naresh Kadyan,
Convener, Kadyan Khap International,
-http://kadyankhapinternational.blogspot.com/
C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar,
Sector - 14, ROHINI,
DELHI - 110085.
-http://www.indymedia.org/en/2009/07/926933.shtml
+91-9813010595, 9313312099.

Sunday, February 24, 2008